We love digital - Call
03332 207 677 and say hello - Mon - Fri, 9am - 5pm
Call 03332 207 677
Unlike 08 numbers, 03 numbers cost the same to call as geographic landline numbers (starting 01 and 02), even from a mobile phone. They are also normally included in your inclusive call minutes. Please note we may record some calls.
Aggressive link building is a buzz word constantly thrown around the industry, but what does it mean and what is deemed too aggressive?
In truth there is no real definition for ‘aggressive link building’ but in general it can be split into two separate meanings.
1. Proactively building a variety of links to a specific page using a string of techniques. This exercise will be high in volume with a range of different strategies.
2. Building high volume links to the same URL using the same technique and the same anchor text (over and over). Buying links would also fall into this category.
In my opinion there is a huge difference between the first definition and the second. The main being that search engines frown upon the second strategy and can sometimes penalise your rankings if you adopt this approach.
Below are some tips to avoid being over aggressive with your link building.
Building links back to your site with appropriate anchor text can definitely aid your search engine rankings. However, over do it and it can easily look spammy and unnatural (in the eyes of the search engines). As a general rule I would keep to the ‘anchor text sweet spot’ which is 30% exact match and 70% brand name or phrase variation.
For example, if you wanted to target the term ‘Personal Trainer London’ you would only build 30% of your links with this anchor text. The other 70% would reference variations like ‘Personal Fitness Trainer London’ and your brand name.
‘Variety is the spice of life’ and the spice of link building. Don’t rely on one source to build your links. If 30% of your links come from an article site, blog or forum then this will look unnatural. You also run the risk of losing a high percentage of links if Google has an algorithm update. Websites that relied solely on Ezine articles to push their search engine rankings are a classic example of being a victim to the recent panda update.
If you spread your bets you have a better chance of maintaining a healthy link profile. Don’t rely on one source. My advice would be to use the scatter gun approach: links from forums, articles, blogs, press releases, social media, bookmarking and hubs will ensure you sustain a variety of sources.
SEO is all about opinion and mine is to not use this strategy. This aggressive approach can get you thousands of links with minimum effort in a very short space of time. The downside is it looks extremely unnatural if you adopt a load of new links overnight. Google can heavily penalise a domain if they suspect any links have been bought.
This is a tempting strategy and there are many high profile sites that have run the risk (some successfully, others less so). There is no doubt buying links can have quick gains but with quick gains come massive consequences. If you’re after sustainable rankings I would definitely avoid this approach.
In short, there is a thin line between aggressive link building and foolish link building. Controlled aggression would be a constant flow of links from a variety of reputable sources (and varied anchor text). Buying links or relying on the same site and ‘exact’ anchor text leaves you running the risk of being too aggressive.
In today’s multichannel world, there are mountains of data which provide insights into how users have interacted with your business and their path to conversion (or non-conversion). It is important to understand performance with multichannel marketing, which can be achieved through attribution modelling. Attribution refers to assigning credit to something (a channel, touchpoint, etc.) for the role it played in the final conversion. An attribution model is a rule, or set of rules, that assigns this credit correctly to the right channel or touchpoint.
For a long time, Bing, the UK’s second-largest search engine, has been underappreciated and, in some instances, even ignored. Often regarded as the inferior search engine to market leader Google, Bing has historically struggled to appeal to many in the digital world. Most PPC analysts would give justified reasons for neglecting Bing for so long; these include the volume of traffic and the user experience just not matching up to Google. However, the validity of these assessments is now diminishing. Bing has grown and improved rapidly in the last couple of years; if you are not integrating it into your comprehensive digital marketing plan, you run the risk of missing out on a large portion of your chosen market and significant revenue.