We love digital - Call
03332 207 677 and say hello - Mon - Fri, 9am - 5pm
Call 03332 207 677
Unlike 08 numbers, 03 numbers cost the same to call as geographic landline numbers (starting 01 and 02), even from a mobile phone. They are also normally included in your inclusive call minutes. Please note we may record some calls.
For each and every one of us somewhere along the line the SEO industry has turned us all in to robots. We tried to fight it but the desire to appease the Google robot finally hit us all and I‘m sure we can all admit at one point or another to using tactics that may have seemed a bit “robotic” or formulaic.
Robotic thinking, at least in the context of online marketing, concerns those moments where a project becomes more about ticking boxes and chasing ever growing numbers. Any time an SEO project has thought more about quantity rather than quality it’s turned us in to robots and it has to stop.
Robotic thinking corrupts the internet, the brands who put their trusts into SEO agencies and pretty much the entire Internet.
You’ll see signs of robot thinking all over the Interflora ranking drop. The entire situation smacks of people thinking like robots. With hindsight it’s easy to say that 150 advertorial links in a month and hundreds of articles with the exact same anchor text keywords would get a website hit. But when people are in robot mode and chasing rankings they can often be blind to that.
It’s the only justification to understand how such a situation arose. Despite all of their algorithm updates it’s a sorry scenario that Google still very often reward sites that manipulate the algorithm on a large scale.
Which is why Interflora had such great rankings. They were pumping out tons of content and it worked. Which could explain why they did more and more and before you know it got stuck in a vicious cycle.
When an SEO campaign becomes more about scaling every number upwards to reach large numbers instead of a long term strategy you’ve turned in to a robot.
Yet this isn’t exclusive to Interflora and actually if you look at almost any SEO tool on the market it’s easy to understand how we are all turning in to robots.
For example, here’s a screenshot from Linkdex which shows the number of links a client has in relation to other clients. We can see that in this market blogs and directories supposedly work great……..
So what’s an SEO to do? The graph doesn’t lie and let’s face it if our client was the one with the very small light blue line on the right it looks like the only way to compete is to quickly get lots of links from blogs and directories.
That there is the exact moment we turned in to robots. It’s possibly what Interflora did and it’s just not going to work as a long term strategy any more.
The second we dictate our strategy based on a single data point, we’ve lost. Whilst there is lots of amazing data in Linkdex this is one example of how a tool can very easily change the way we approach a problem and it’s not exclusive to this report or tool.
Everywhere you look there are different metrics crying out for your attention and a multitude of KPI’s that you can use to assess the success of your campaign but just how many really help in isolation? All the tools mentioned below are brilliant for various things but results can make us look at things differently:
There have never been more tools for SEO, which in theory should make the barrier to entry in the industry lower when really it’s never been harder to learn all you need to know. Plus if you could truly trust tools to do all of the work then what’s the difference between an SEO paid £15,000 a year and one paid £150,000?
That’s what separates the robots from the humans. Tools can make our lives amazing or they can make them hell. It’s all about knowing what data to use and what data to ignore which is something only a human can do. You can scrape as much data and build as many API spreadsheets as you want but if the person using them acts like a robot then it’s all for nothing.
For me personally my first ever robot moment was when I discovered Submiteaze many years ago. It’s a link building tool that includes lots of directories and allows you to submit to them. I thought it was amazing and could save me hours and hours. The day I discovered the turbo submitter I thought I’d found the golden goose.
In reality most of the directories didn’t accept my requests and it just became an exercise in robotic thinking and processes. In fact when we did our own study back in 2011 in to the tool we found of 210 links none were accepted after 3 months.
So what seemed like an amazing tool was actually just a colossal waste of my time. Yet when I was thinking like a robot I thought it was unbelievably amazing and that I was doing a great job. As such, it has been a long time since I have gone anywhere near a tool like this!
So here’s the thing. If used incorrectly tools blind us. They encourage us to focus on single data streams – like getting an A for on page optimisation – or to constantly chase other people.
Keyword stuffing, over optimised pages, fake reviews, blog spinning and general flooding the internet with rubbish will look great to some tools. Sure you might build 100 links, sure the tool might say you’ve done amazingly but all that really matters is whether what you have done is sustainable.
Tools presume that the world is static. That the variables are fixed and that getting to X will mean you get result Y. Yet the reality is everything is constantly in flux. What ranks one day may not rank tomorrow and chasing a static metric is no guarantee of long term success.
It’s easy to feel like you are winning when you act like a robot and it’s easier to justify your progress. Saying “we built 50 links this month” is far easier than saying “we built one link all month” but if that link was great content on a strong site it’ll probably be far more stable.
I think that’s why robotic thinking happens; a desire to justify progress and a need to feel like you have a clear goal. But the types of goals we’ve relied on in the past – building more links, increasing social fans, and improving rankings – they can easily be gamed.
The metrics that matter such as engagement, brand opinion and long term increased value are harder to achieve or measure and don’t work with robotic thinking. They don’t look as good on an annual report and they don’t get bonuses for great work.
Robots get bonuses and a huge amount of praise when things are going well. Humans find it tough to justify why their long term strategies aren’t bringing in results early on. So that’s why we became robots and it’s why I’m unplugging you.
Yes you should use tools. Yes you should use checklists. Yes you should still have clear goals and strive to take on the competition but all I’m asking is think.
And if nothing else think about what you’ll do the day you come in the office to find your client has fallen out of the rankings. If that doesn’t scare you in to a change then you really are a robot.
I’ll be chatting about this topic more at ionSearch in my keynote: 86 Billion Free SEO Tools: Why Your Brain Is The Best Tool Of All so would welcome any comments below that help continue the debate.
For a long time, Bing, the UK’s second-largest search engine, has been underappreciated and, in some instances, even ignored. Often regarded as the inferior search engine to market leader Google, Bing has historically struggled to appeal to many in the digital world. Most PPC analysts would give justified reasons for neglecting Bing for so long; these include the volume of traffic and the user experience just not matching up to Google. However, the validity of these assessments is now diminishing. Bing has grown and improved rapidly in the last couple of years; if you are not integrating it into your comprehensive digital marketing plan, you run the risk of missing out on a large portion of your chosen market and significant revenue.
When it comes to building a content marketing campaign, it can be difficult to know where to start. You may have an initial idea but bringing it to life and getting your message seen are always harder than initially thought.