We love digital - Call
03332 207 677
and say hello - Mon - Fri, 9am - 5pm
Call 03332 207 677
We're hiring
Our in-house SEO Copywriter, Steve Logan, recently made an excellent post that explored the importance of spelling and grammar, with particular reference to writing for the web (see ‘The Typos and Language Errors that Turn Visitors Away).
Another consideration content writers and search engine optimisers need to have is for the use of synonyms in their writing. For some time now, Google have been showing synonyms bolded in the search results for stemming variants, such as the plural of a word, e.g. the searcher enters ‘picture’ but ‘pictures’ is also shown in bold.
Steven Baker, a Google Software Engineer, has just posted an article ‘Helping computers understand language‘ in which he explains how Google is constantly refining their algorithms in an effort to improve the quality of their search results. As part of this development, he announced that the search engine is now going to start putting in bold those synonyms where their algorithm is confident the meaning of a word is the same as the one searched for, e.g. searched for ‘pictures’ but ‘photos’ is bolded.
Clearly this can never be 100% successful and he even gives an example of a known error in their search results and some further examples of where this could be applied.
Although he doesn’t mention localisation, it will be interesting to see how this bolding of synonyms will (continue to) effect local search results. Just today, I carried out an experiment searching for UK results of the term ‘organise search engine optimisation’:
Google UK Localised Results
You’ll see that the second result has the US spelling of ‘organise’ and ‘optimisation’. To compound this, the site in question is very definitely an American company hosted in the US.
I’m sure Google will have ‘armies of Engineers’ looking in to refining local search results as well. Let’s just hope that our ‘special relationship’ hasn’t quite extended to swapping out the letter ‘s’ for ‘z’ just yet…
Share this post
More related posts on this topic and that of UK spelling v US search results:
http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/googles-spelling-problems-are-worse-than-we-thought/
http://www.annabelhodges.com/optimise-optimize-part-deux/
I hope that there isn’t a Blair/Campbell dossier confirming that we’ve agreed to start using American spellings…
google.co.uk is still enforcing the American way with regard to search suggestions. A query for ‘optimisation’ only brings up suggestions spelt with a ‘z’. This should also be on the minds of marketers to draw traffic. Further > http://goo.gl/KGMY
Thanks for the link through to this information Adam. Although it should be on the minds of marketers, you will see on another of our posts – Typos and Language Errors – that it is not as clear cut as using American-English.
What do you think?
Unlike 08 numbers, 03 numbers cost the same to call as geographic landline numbers (starting 01 and 02), even from a mobile phone. They are also normally included in your inclusive call minutes. Please note we may record some calls.
3 Comments