We love digital 0330 353 0300
You can have a brilliant campaign, a strong set of data and an eye-catching creative concept. But none of that matters if your email sits unopened in a journalist’s inbox.
Getting a Digital PR pitch read isn’t about using clever tricks or writing increasingly dramatic subject lines. It comes down to relevance, timing and making the story as easy as possible to understand.
Journalists are busy. Your pitch needs to show them, quickly, why the story matters to their audience and what you can offer.
Here’s how to give your next pitch the best possible chance of being opened, read and considered.
A good pitch sent to the wrong person is still the wrong pitch.
Before writing your email, make sure the journalist regularly covers the subject you’re contacting them about. Check their recent articles, the publication’s main sections and the types of stories they tend to write.
Look at factors such as:
For example, a journalist who covers household finances may be interested in new research about rising living costs. They’re less likely to cover a campaign focused purely on interior design trends, even if the publication has a broader lifestyle section.
Smaller, carefully researched media lists will often be more useful than sending the same email to every contact you can find. Relevance beats reach when the people on the list were never likely to cover the story in the first place.
Your subject line should tell the journalist what the story is. It shouldn’t make them work to find out.
Avoid vague phrases such as:
These subject lines don’t give the recipient a reason to open the email. They could relate to almost anything.
Instead, lead with the strongest part of the story. Useful formats include:
Be specific, but don’t give away so much that the subject line becomes difficult to scan. It also needs to accurately represent the story. Clickbait might earn an open, but it won’t build trust.
A simple test is to ask whether the subject line could work as an article headline. It doesn’t need to be perfect, but the main story should be immediately clear.
Don’t make the journalist search for the reason you’re contacting them.
Your opening lines should explain the main finding, why it matters and why it’s relevant now. Lengthy introductions about your company, client or campaign process can come later, if they’re needed at all.
A strong opening might follow this structure: “New research has found that [main finding], with [important supporting detail]. The results highlight [why the finding matters to the publication’s audience].”
You can still be friendly. A short greeting is perfectly appropriate, particularly when you already know the journalist. Just make sure several lines of small talk don’t bury the actual story.
It’s also worth avoiding openings such as “We’re excited to announce”. Your client may be excited, and you should be too, but the journalist needs to know why their readers will care.
A journalist shouldn’t have to work out why your pitch is suitable for them.
Reference the section they write for, the audience they serve or a recent topic they’ve covered. This doesn’t mean adding a forced compliment about an article from three years ago. It means showing that you understand their work.
For example: As you regularly cover practical advice for small businesses, I thought the findings on late-payment pressures may be relevant to your readers.
This is more useful than: I’m a huge fan of your work and thought you’d love this.
Genuine personalisation is about editorial relevance, not flattery.
Where appropriate, you can also adjust the angle for different contacts. A national publication may want the overall finding, while a regional journalist may be more interested in local figures. A trade publication may need technical detail, while a consumer title may prefer practical advice.
The campaign stays the same. The reason for covering it changes.
There’s no perfect word count for every pitch, but shorter is usually better when all the necessary information is included.
Use short paragraphs and clear formatting. If the campaign includes several findings, list the strongest points as bullets rather than hiding them in a large block of text.
A clear pitch will usually include:
Avoid copying an entire press release into the email. Give the journalist enough information to judge the story, then provide a link to further details.
You should also check how the email appears on mobile. A pitch that looks brief on a large screen can feel much longer on a phone.
Give journalists everything they need
Interest can disappear quickly if covering the story creates unnecessary work.
Before sending your pitch, prepare the supporting materials a journalist might request. Depending on the campaign, these could include:
Keep these materials in a clearly labelled folder or on an accessible campaign page. Avoid filling the first email with large attachments, particularly when the journalist hasn’t asked for them.
It’s also important to check that links work, access permissions are correct and filenames make sense. “Final_graph_v7_USE_THIS_ONE.png” may make sense internally, but it’s not especially helpful to anyone else.
A good Digital PR pitch has a reason to exist at that particular moment.
That reason could be:
You don’t always need a breaking-news hook, but you do need to show why the information is timely.
Avoid forcing a weak connection to an unrelated news story. Journalists will spot it quickly. The link should add genuine relevance rather than simply giving you an excuse to resend an existing campaign.
Timing also means paying attention to the wider news agenda. A pitch may be strong, but it can still be overlooked when a major event is dominating coverage. Where possible, consider publication deadlines and avoid sending a non-urgent pitch at a time when the journalist is likely to be handling breaking news.
Your pitch should give the journalist a strong starting point without trying to dictate exactly how they must cover the story.
Explain the most interesting angle, provide the supporting evidence and make any useful assets available.
Then leave room for the journalist to shape the piece for their publication.
Phrases such as “This would be perfect for your website” can sound presumptuous. A more helpful approach is: “I thought this might be relevant to your coverage of [topic], particularly the finding that [specific result].”
This sounds confident without assuming coverage is guaranteed.
Following up is a normal part of Digital PR, but the message should add value.
A useful follow-up might:
Avoid sending repeated messages that simply ask whether the journalist has seen your email. One clear, polite follow-up will often be enough unless you have new information to share.
Keep it brief.
For example: “Hi [Name], I wanted to follow up on the research below in case the regional findings are useful for your upcoming coverage. I can also provide the full local breakdown and expert comment if helpful.”
Don’t use guilt, false urgency or comments about how many times you’ve contacted them. No one enjoys being told they’ve ignored three previous emails.
The best time to start building a relationship with a journalist isn’t necessarily when you need coverage.
Pay attention to what relevant journalists are writing about. Be helpful when they request sources or expert comments, and respond quickly when they show interest in a story.
Most importantly, be reliable. Check your figures, answer questions honestly and don’t promise materials or interviews you can’t provide.
This doesn’t mean contacting journalists simply to “stay on their radar”. Communication should have a purpose. A useful source is more memorable than a stream of emails with nothing new to say.
Check the pitch before sending
Before you press send, run through this checklist:
It’s also worth reading the pitch aloud. This can help you spot long sentences, repeated points and wording that sounds less natural than it did in your head.
Don’t forget to ask someone else to review it too. A fresh pair of eyes can catch those pesky mistakes you may have missed and give the pitch a useful sense check. If the story and its relevance are clear to someone who hasn’t worked on the campaign, you’re likely on the right track.
There’s no subject-line trick that can guarantee coverage. Journalists make editorial decisions based on their audience, their workload and the stories competing for attention.
What you can control is the quality of your approach.
Research the recipient, make the story clear, provide useful evidence and respect their time. A relevant pitch that gets to the point will always have a stronger chance than a generic email sent to an oversized media list.
Need help creating Digital PR campaigns and pitches that earn attention? Get in touch to talk through your goals.